Libertarianism: Championing Individual Freedom and Economic Autonomy in Political Philosophy

Libertarianism, a diverse set of views in political philosophy, places utmost importance on individual freedom. It views coercion as the direct opposite of this freedom. While there are instances where individuals can be compelled to act in certain ways, such as refraining from infringing on the liberty of others, they cannot be coerced to serve the collective good. This respect for individual freedom is a cornerstone of libertarian thought, empowering individuals to make their own choices.

Within philosophical debates over justice, libertarian positions are most controversial in distributive justice. In this context, libertarians typically endorse a free-market economy—an economic order based on private property rights, freedom of contract, and voluntary cooperation. Libertarians usually regard contemporary democratic states’ redistribution of wealth as an unjustified use of coercion that violates the rights of individuals. The same is true of many forms of economic regulation. Just as people have substantial rights to individual freedom in their personal and social affairs, libertarians argue, they also have strong rights to freedom in their economic affairs. Thus, the rights of freedom of contract and exchange, freedom of occupation, and private property are taken as seriously as the rights to choose who to be friends with, what kind of clothes to wear, which religion to follow, and so forth. Concerning justice, libertarian theory inherits a political morality from the classical (or proto-) liberal tradition, embodied by John Locke, David Hume, Adam Smith, and Immanuel Kant. These authors regard the state’s moral function as enforcing a system of rights that facilitates socio economic cooperation and little else. Moreover, it inherits political sociology from the radical—individualist anarchist—side of the liberal tradition associated with Benjamin Tucker, Thomas Hodgskin, and Lysander Spooner. 

In their view, state action, even when seemingly well-intentioned, is essentially an outcome of, or heavily conditioned by, class dynamics, which refers to the power struggles and conflicts between different social classes. In its most potent form, this view takes the state as the vehicle by which a dominant class uses coercion to plunder the rest of society.

*****